首页> 外文OA文献 >Context and explicit threat cue modulation of the startle reflex: Preliminary evidence of distinctions between adolescents with principal fear disorders versus distress disorders
【2h】

Context and explicit threat cue modulation of the startle reflex: Preliminary evidence of distinctions between adolescents with principal fear disorders versus distress disorders

机译:惊吓反射的背景和明确的威胁提示调制:初步证据表明,患有主要恐惧症和窘迫症的青少年之间存在差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Anxiety and depression are prevalent, impairing disorders. High comorbidity has raised questions about how to define and classify them. Structural models emphasise distinctions between "fear" and "distress" disorders while other initiatives propose they be defined by neurobiological indicators that cut across disorders. This study examined startle reflex (SR) modulation in adolescents with principal fear disorders (specific phobia; social phobia) (n=20), distress disorders (unipolar depressive disorders, dysthymia, generalised anxiety disorder; post-traumatic stress disorder) (n=9), and controls (n=29) during (a) baseline conditions, (b) threat context conditions (presence of contraction pads over the biceps muscle), and (c) an explicit threat cue paradigm involving phases that signalled safety from aversive stimuli (early and late stages of safe phases; early stages of danger phases) and phases that signalled immediate danger of an aversive stimulus (late stages of danger phases). Adolescents with principal fear disorders showed larger SRs than other groups throughout safe phases and early stages of danger phases. SRs did not differ between groups during late danger phases. Adolescents with principal distress disorders showed attenuated SRs during baseline and context conditions compared to other groups. Preliminary findings support initiatives to redefine emotional disorders based on neurobiological functioning.
机译:焦虑和抑郁是普遍存在的障碍。高合并症引发了有关如何对其进行定义和分类的问题。结构模型强调“恐惧”和“困扰”疾病之间的区别,而其他措施则建议通过跨越疾病的神经生物学指标来定义它们。这项研究调查了患有主要恐惧症(特定恐惧症;社交恐惧症)(n = 20),窘迫症(单相抑郁症,心境障碍,全身性焦虑症;创伤后应激障碍)的青少年的惊吓反射(SR)调节(n = 9),以及(a)基线情况,(b)威胁情境条件(在二头肌上存在收缩垫)和(c)明确的威胁提示范式(涉及阶段)表明厌恶状态表示安全的阶段(n = 29)刺激(安全阶段的早期和晚期;危险阶段的早期)和预示着厌恶刺激的立即危险的阶段(危险阶段的后期)。在安全阶段和危险阶段的早期阶段,具有主要恐惧症的青少年表现出比其他群体更大的SR。在危险后期,各组的SR并无差异。与其他组相比,患有主要窘迫疾病的青少年在基线和背景条件下的SR减弱。初步发现支持基于神经生物学功能重新定义情绪障碍的计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号